Doubt Is the Key to Knowledge

Doubt is the key to acquaintance (Persian Proverb). To what extent is this true in two atomic number 18as of companionship? Firstly, to understand fully the strengthenrb, definitions should be given. Doubt is the mental status of be stuck between believing and disbelieving, involving uncertainty and distrust in a particular situation or issue or when in that location is lack of hard evidence and facts to support the alleged information, action, motive or decision.When you question a nonion or you be open to hunting or reassessment of it, you are having doubt. Only when you female genital organ find the defense for your doubt, one that satisfies whatever convinces you to think differently, then you will no daylong move over doubts. To have k flatledge is equal to have an explanation, understanding or reasoning to things in the world. Knowledge mass be both private and collective, and not all knowledge is a fact. The big bang supposition , the surmisal of relativ ity, and the string theory etc. rovides us explanations and reasoning to why the world is the way it is. These theories are what we know further are not necessarily the fact we do not know if these theories are redress, but still knowing these theories count as our knowledge. Knowledge can practise from our personal experience as well. This essay will seek to overcompensate the extent to which doubt is manifested as a key to knowledge regarding two areas of knowledge, accomplishment and History.According to Academic Press Dictionary of Science & Technology, wisdom is the systematic observation of natural horizontalts and conditions in order to discover facts active them and to formulate laws and principles based on these facts and also the organized body of knowledge that is derived from such observations and that can be verified or tested by further investigation. There is a view that acquisition is seen as provisional, which way of life that it is subjected to being falsified.In an ever- create world were parvenu discoveries are make all the measure pourboireing to juvenile theories and realizations, older theories are of all time at the nemesis of being falsified. Even the new theories, the scientific community will smartly doubt and criticize whatsoever ideas until enough evidence is produced to back them up. It is without background to say that the basis of scientific growth is on inferred or even imagined hypotheses by scientist in an attempt to create or explain something new or unexplained.Experiments are carried out and positive results can turn these hypotheses into theories and mayhap knowledge, of course until they are doubted and contested against by new theories that explores the opposition of the theory in question. Throughout the history of Science, knowledge has been derived from the selfsame processes. In early Mesopotamian study, the footing was believed to be a flat disk with a dome, until Ferdinand Magellan managed to arise that Earth was spherical after flourishingly circumnavigating the Earth in the fifteenth Century.Another example would be of the Italian physicist Galileo Galilei who, despite the endless controversy, criticism and denouncing made against him, proved false the long withheld notion of the geocentric view that the Earth was at the center of the Universe. Thus, it is evident that through the use of scientific theories, unless disproved otherwise, knowledge is updated and will persist in as such through continual doubt. therefrom we can see that as long as there is doubt, new things will be explored and old laws might be disproved of although it is perceived as knowledge to everyone.Although doubt leads to more and more correct viewpoint of an issue, we can never be certain that what we think of as knowledge now is definitely the real truth and can never be disproved. However, with that being said, I believe that doubt and doubt alone cannot be the bushel key to gain scien tific knowledge, but continual doubt can in reality leads to wasting of time and effort and worst is to eliminate the correct fact that is suppose to be true which can lead to a regression of knowledge.Firstly, there are many theories in science that remain in the gray area that cannot be logically proven with our electric current knowledge, uniform for example the existence of black holes. No scientists have been successful in proving its existence. However, one of the many theories of the black hole might truly be true but as nobody can prove it so, scientists in the field may invest pointless effort into developing new theories instead of directing that effort into proving the theory, which is actually true. Also there are truths that can never be doubted or proven otherwise like the fact that the Earth orbits around the word.Thus, although doubt lends to the progress of science and hence knowledge, it also has limitations which might prove detrimental to the growth of knowle dge. The succeeding(a) issue is that of religion. Religion is a collection of cultural systems, belief systems, and worldviews that connect humanity to spirituality and, sometimes, to moral values. According to New York Times source Peter Steinfels, published in July 19, 2008, religion is no longer like it was in the past when religious creed was present in everything sight do, even for oubters. Nowadays it is almost inevitable that believers must live in a condition of doubt and uncertainty. We often think that there is no room for doubt within faith, that doubt is weakness. Even worse, most conservativist faiths regard doubt as something to be battled against because it is dangerous to ones faith. It can lead to heresy, doubting the existence of God, and, according to their belief, perhaps loss of salvation and fadeless torture in the fires of Hell.Of course , it had been pointed out by religious thinkers a long time ago that being doubtful about a religion is not the oppo site polar of the religion but it is actually the better way of having faith rather than blind belief. Personally, although I am a devout Buddhist, many a time I have found myself doubting my get religion. For example, I sometimes question whether there is such thing called karma or does everything retributory happen by rule and karma is just a way to scare believers into doing good deeds for they dread of having to suffer the consequence afterwards.Ultimately there are people who are kind-hearted and except still suffer every day. I found my reception not long ago about how it is related to another issue of conversion and bringing over karma. I did feel guilty of doubting Buddha and his linguistic communication but then I learned that he said Do not accept any of my words on faith, Believing them just because I said them. Be like an analyst buying gold, who cuts, burns, And critically examines his product for authenticity. Only accept what passes the test By proving useful a nd adept in your life.The Buddha (Jnanasara-samuccaya) Doutb, to Buddha is necessary because there is no point in pastime a religion blindly. According to the Buddha, religion should be left to ones own free choice. Religion is not a law, but a disciplinary code which should be marryed with understanding. Thats why the Buddha told his disciples not to blindly follow his teachings but test them and verify them through their own experience like a goldsmith tests the purity of gold. However sometimes fir belief in the spiritual side of things can be necessary or at least comforting.In the book The Age of Doubt Tracing the grow of Our Religious Uncertainty, an example of a 20-year-old boy was given. He is of an harmonised and intellectual appearance, but hes soon beset with existential and religiously-inflected questions, tied to his faith, that he feels compelled to ask his doctor What am I? What are all these things that are made like me? Why am I? . Why am I? is perhaps the m ost remarkable of these questions, with religion offering an answer more confident and comforting than science perhaps ever could.But as his doctor explains, the patient finds no comfort in theology. He is in one sense suspended between two options, greater faith and firmer uncertainty, yet neither strikes him as possible or appealing. Ultimately religions are spiritual havens that most followers take refuge in and by constantly doubt its truth, it defeats the purpose of having religions as people are always have this insecurity that what they are doing, adhering to may not do any good to them despite what their religions says.In conclusion, due to the broadness and ambiguity of the knowledge areas of Science and History, it is impossible to accurately evaluate doubt and its ability to present itself as the key to attaining knowledge. Nonetheless, through careful study and research on these versatile areas of knowledge, this essay presents the stand that doubt, to a large extent, i s an indispensable and important factor as the key to knowledge. 1505 words &8212&8212&8212&8212&8212&8212&8212&8212&8212&8212&8212&8212&8212&8212- 2 . Sharpe, Alfred. Doubt. The Catholic Encyclopedia, Vol. 5 (New York Robert Appleton). Retrieved 2008-10-21. 3 . http//blogs. yis. ac. jp/13hwangj/2011/09/05/definition-of-knowledge/ 4 . http//en. wikipedia. org/wiki/Religioncite_note-0 5 . http//www. nytimes. com/2008/07/19/us/19beliefs. hypertext mark-up language 6 . http//viewonbuddhism. org/dharma. html 7 . http//www. budsas. org/ebud/whatbudbeliev/277. htm